Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Netherlands Institute for Ecology
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University Amsterdam
University of Plymouth
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment
Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone
 


Habitat Dynamics at the Coast-Catchment Interface
Synthesis Results

4. Major drivers and pressures: anthropogenic causes of coastal habitat change

 
Major drivers of coastal change have been summarised by Turner (2004), in an aggregate DP-SIR analysis for all European seas, setting a time horizon at 2050 (Table 4). These drivers act together in often complex synergy to lead to environmental state changes with ultimate consequences for coastal habitats. We broke down our analysis into three parts: driving pressures, environmental state changes and expected consequences for habitat change (Table 4).

Climate change, including the component due to human society, lists as a major driver that is foreseen to have major effects in the coastal zone (see also Nicholls & Klein, 2004). Most drivers, however, are related to human population growth and economic expansion. Industrialisation, naval traffic intensity, fisheries, coastal aquaculture and port development, as well as offshore mining for gas and oil all have increased greatly in the past decades, and probably will continue to do so. Together with increased tourism this has lead to an increased urbanisation of the coastal zone. Increased development of the coastal zone is accompanied by reclamation-increased armouring of coastal defences, and the narrowing of the zone where natural coastal processes may take place (coastal squeeze). Climate change is foreseen to have the most severe impacts in the Arctic and the Caspian and Black Sea. In the arctic, the large scale disappearance of sea ice will lead to wholesale loss of habitat for arctic mammals and the foodwebs they depend on (biodiversity loss). The loss of coastal ice will also enhance coastal erosion at these higher latitudes. In the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, freshwater influxes are foreseen to drop greatly. Tourism is expected to notably increase along Mediterranean and Baltic coasts. Fisheries and aquaculture will continue to have substantial impacts on coastal waters, despite considerable regulatory effort as regards the former. Aquaculture will probably expand into most European seas. It’s impacts have been well studied, though outside ELOISE (e.g. LIFE QUALITY, cf Read & Fernandes, 2003). Agriculture is expected to intensify in the new member states of the EC and thus lead to increased nutrient loads into recipient seas (Baltic, Black Sea). Future habitat losses were foreseen to be the most detrimental in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea.

Sea level rise is foreseen to lead to ‘removal’ or inland migration of sea cliffs, shingle beaches, sandy shores and salt marsh habitats due to enhanced erosion. These, therefore, will give way for aquatic habitats when natural re-alignment of the coast is impossible. Often, coastal squeeze will thus remove natural soft coasts until the armoured sea defence.

  Atlantic Coast Arctic Baltic Sea Black Sea Caspian Sea Medi-terranean North Sea
A. Main driving pressures
climate change (CC) + ++ + ++ ++ + (loc++) + (loc++)
built env expansion (BE) + 0 ++ + - ++ +
trade, ports and related industry (P) + 0 ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
tourism (T) + 0 ++ + (loc++) 0 ++ +
fishing and aquaculture (F) ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
agriculture (A) + 0 ++ ++ ++ + +
B. Environmental state change /impacts
sea level rise and coastal erosion (SE) + ++ ++ + ++ ++ + (loc++)
contamination (C) + (loc++) + + (loc++) ++ ++ + (loc++) ++
eutrophication (E) + (loc++) 0 ++ ++ ++ + (loc++) +
biodiversity and habitat loss (incl. invasive exotic impact) (B) + + + (loc++) ++ ++ + (loc++) + (loc++)
C. Expected habitat changes
cliffs, shingle beaches, kelp beds   move inland, erode (SE) erode, coastal squeeze (SE)   erode (SE) erode, coastal squeeze (SE) erode, coastal squeeze (PT, BE, SE)
wetlands and dune complexes   erode (SE), get lost (B, P, PE) get lost (B, P, PE)   get lost (B, P, PE, T) coastal squeeze (PT, BE, SE)
salt marsh   erode, move inland (SE)   get lost (B, P, PE)   get lost (B, P, PE, T) coastal squeeze (PT, BE. SE)
sand-banks and mudflats   redistribute (SE) submerge (SE) species disappear (B, C) species disappear (B, C)   species dis-appear (B, C)
seagrass beds     lower depth , area(E) lower depth, area (E) lower depth, area (E) lower depth (E)  
Lagoons     more sedi-ment anoxia (E) incr. nutrient loading (F), more sediment anoxia (E) Incr. nutrient loading (F), more sediment anoxia (E) Incr. nutrient loading (F), more sedi-ment anoxia (F, E)  
Subtidal sediments more trawling disturbance (F), incr. nutrient loading (F)   more trawling distur-bance (F) more trawling disturb. (F), nutr loading (F), sediment anoxia (F, E) more trawling disturb (F), incr.nutrient loading (F), sediment anoxia (F, E) More trawling disturbance (F), incr. nutrient loading (F), more sedi-ment anoxia (F, E) more trawling disturbance (F)
open sea pelagic     altered plankton com-position (E, F) altered plankton com-position (E) altered plankton com-position (E) altered plankton composition (E)  
Table 4. Aggregate DP-SIR analysis for European seas: prevalence of major drivers/pressures (A) the resultant state change (B), and expected habitat changes (C) (A and B adopted from Turner, 2004)
 
Notes: ++ = very significant; + = significant, 0 = minor to insignificant; (loc++) = locally very significant. Contamination = heavy metal accumulation, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants and their residues, oil and gas spills.

<< Habitat Dynamics Contents - back-to-top - 5. Conclusions >>